Comment and Reply on Keller et al 2007 in EPSL by Schulte et al, 2008 2008

GSA Philadelphia 2006: Comments on the new Brazos cores

CCnet debate Januari 2006 On.......foraminifers

GeolSoc Great Chicxulub debate Smit-Keller (will be restored at GeolSoc here)
What the BBC Horizon film did not show....
Flaws in Keller's papers
Dolomite or foraminifers?
These Foraminifers should be tested!
Yaxcopoil-1 critical and controversial core-segment from 794.11-794.60 m.
 

And, here, what Dutch newpapers have to say (in dutch!)

See also Gerta Keller's Webpage!

More Links to interesting stuff

Parallel discussion :Tyberg-Keller, Stinnesbeck

Parallel discussion interludeMarcus Hartings complaintsSmit's answer to M. Harting

DEBATES AND CONTROVERSIES ON THE CRETACEOUS TERTIARY (K/T) BOUNDARY
REFERENCES
Keller, G., Adatte, T., A., Z. B., and D., S., 2007, Chicxulub impact predates K-T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas: EPSL, v. 255, p. 339-356.
Peter Schulte, R. P. S., Henk Brinkhuis, Agnes Kontny, Philippe , and Claeys, S. G., Jan Smit 2008, Comment on the paper: ”Chicxulub impact predates K-T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas” by Keller et al. (2007)
: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 269, no. 3-4, p. 614-620.
Gerta Keller, T. A., Gerald Baum and Zsolt Berner, 2008, Reply to ‘Chicxulub impact predates K-T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas’ Comment by Schulte et al.
: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. In Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 17 January 2008.